Safety Celebration Lunch at the MCC

We often need reminding of our successes as we work our way along the journey to a positive safety culture. One way that the MCC ensure they do this is to hold a celebration lunch at Christmas time in order to thank all the people who have been involved in their safety program over the year. This includes OHS representatives, committee members, managers and contractors who have contributed. Senior managers are also invited as is the CEO to address the group on the day.

This December we had the privilege to present at the lunch as they aim to invite a speaker each year to present on the topic of safety. During the presentation we explored the fact that every organisation needs to pause for a moment and reflect on their successes. The OHS Manager at the MCC, Stephen Allen, was able to clearly delineate the key wins they had achieved during the year. This included:

  • The recertification of our Safety Management System against the SafetyMAP Advanced criteria (this was a full system audit against all 125 criteria).
  •  No reportable incidents for the past 12 months (MCC staff or patrons)
  •  A very successful internal audit and site inspection program. The audits resulted in just under 80 valuable actions to improve our systems, and the inspections have increased active participation in safety related activities

Participation in this event reminded me how important it is to measure successes using positive lead indicators and then sharing them at a significant event. Perhaps in our annual strategic plans we need to ensure that we build in time to celebrate and thank those that have contributed to our successes.

What processes does your company have in place to support Directors’ Duties?

The Centro Ruling was a landmark case last year in which the Federal Court  found that executives and directors of troubled property group Centro breached the Corporations Act by signing off on financial reports that failed to disclose billions of dollars of short-term debt.

In making declarations of contravention, Justice Middleton identified a number of key facts which supported his findings.

A few of these comments included that directors:

  • knew or ought to have known that the current liabilities were larger than disclosed, and that the guarantees had been granted;
  • failed to properly read, understand and give sufficient attention to the content of the financial reports as they related to current liabilities and the guarantees;
  • failed to make enquiry or adequate enquiry of management, the Audit Committee and other members of the Board concerning the apparent deficiencies in the reports;

The case is seen as having major implications for the way company directors do their job.

The head of ASIC, Mr Medcraft, says the ruling clarifies the duties of company directors.

“They can’t just simply delegate to management or rubber-stamp management, they are held to a high standard,” he said.

“I think today’s decision empowers directors, because what it says is, ‘I’m responsible, therefore I want to know what is going on’.”

This points to the importance of 2 things:

  • Directors need to ensure that the organisation’s risk management framework and governance framework are very transparent and support them in their oversight roles
  • Directors need to have in place processes to personally ensure that the reports they are being provided are accurate

Read here for further details of the case.

Centro penalties decision

 

 

 

 

Hydration in the workplace

At a recent Downer Rail project presentation, Chris Hooper presented an interesting project regarding hydration in the workplace.   Read more from the research article.

 

Download hydration paper

The Importance of Situational Awareness

A most recent study published in the Journal of Injury Prevention has shown that the number of people either injured or killed while wearing headphones has tripled in the past six years. The US researchers found that during the six-year period there were 116 cases. Sixteen cases occurred in 2004-05 whilst by 2010-11 that figure had risen to 47.

Most of the incidents involved young people – with an average age of 21 – and 70 per cent of the time the collision was fatal.

Sixty-eight per cent were male and 67 per cent were under 30 years of age. Sixty-four of the 116 victims (55 per cent) were hit by a train. Eighty-one of the 116 collisions (70 per cent) resulted in death,”

Most of the incidents also occurred in urban areas. The researchers say the reason that most of those injured or killed were young people is because that age group has less traffic experience, is less likely to drive cars and use headphones more frequently. They say distraction and sensory deprivation are the two likely factors.

The actual sensory deprivation that results from using headphones with electronic devices may be a unique problem in pedestrian incidents, where auditory cues can be more important than visual ones,”

The study however did not take into account near misses or possible suicidal intentions and it covered iPods, MP3 players and other musical devices but did not include mobile phones.

This study has now prompted calls for a government advertising campaign in Australia and the Pedestrian Council of Australia chair Harold Scruby says headphone-related injuries and deaths in Australia is a growing problem.

“We estimate one in 10 people are using some sort of distracting device when they cross the road – be that headphones, using an iPhone, using a mobile phone, texting or looking at a screen of some kind – but certainly the headphones are a very major factor in all this because you can’t hear traffic approaching,”

Though the study focuses on a growing social issue, Safety practitioners nevertheless need to reflect on current practises within their business around pedestrian movements to understand current risk exposure and to formulate or endorse effective controls.

Solutions in the safety space

As you may already know, we pride ourselves on the enduring relationships we build with our clients. The habit of our clientele is to turn to us again and again, with the invitation to partner their journey in developing solutions that are targeted to address specific business needs as their businesses grow and change.

More recently, we were asked by one such client to formulate and deliver what we coined, technical safety workshops, for their front line leaders and the managers who support them. The aim was to increase the general understanding of the legislative components of Safety and to explore how they in turn address these requirements in the way they conduct their day to day business.

Ultimately, it was about developing a line of sight for the front line leaders so that they could clearly and unambiguously understand the impact of their role. The program was also designed to demonstrate the helpful processes that the business has to enable the front line leaders to address these obligations through clear and directional leadership.

As is our way, the workshops were undertaken using the adult learning principles that we are renowned for. Practical exercises were well received as indeed was the homework component between each workshop that people were asked to report on, upon their return. And their newly discovered insights were fascinating learning for everyone.

The enduring relationships we enjoy with our clients enable us to explore these contextual solutions.  We savour our role in the design and enablement and we welcome such conversations…. perhaps with you too!

Leading Safety at Toll Domestic Forwarding

To understand what they needed to do to achieve their safety objective of “No Injuries”, Toll Domestic Forwarding undertook a Safety Culture Survey across a representative sample of locations throughout their businesses earlier this year.

In partnership with Toll Domestic Forwarding the team at Enhance Solutions spoke to around 160 people across 18 sites, including OH&S representatives, drivers, forklift operators and managers.

The questions we asked included “What does safety mean to you?”, “What currently works?”, “What currently doesn’t work” and “What does good safety culture look like, feel like and sound like?”

That information was then used to develop a safety vision and a three year plan for how to achieve the vision. The next extraordinary step that TDF took clearly illustrated their commitment to the goal of ‘No Injuries’ and the development of a strong, positive safety culture. The Divisional Human Resources Manager and the Divisional Director then visited their branches across Australia and New Zealand to give everyone in the business feedback on:

• What we heard you say

• What we have done

• What we are going to do

In total they visited 29 sites in Australia and 23 sites in New Zealand. They ran a total of 90 one hour sessions which touched the lives of 2,200 employees. What an incredible effort.

As a part of the program they have had a series of powerful posters made up which most sites now have on display.

One of the key messages gained as a result of the survey was the need to skill up the leaders in the business. In order to address this Toll DF have committed to a safety leadership program for all front line staff and above. During the latter half of 2011 they had already worked with us to put 164 of their people through leadership programs. What an incredible effort!

Leading Zero Harm

One of the programs Enhance Solutions is involved with is the Leading Zero Harm program with Downer Australia – Engineering Construction & Services based in Newcastle. This program has now been running for two years.

As a part of the program participants are required to undertake a project with the intention of it being implemented.

Recently three people from the organisation based at Unanderra (Wollongong, NSW) initiated and produced a presentation called “Think Twice! – Driving Safely Values”. The concept was based on targeting and educating young drivers employed by Downer in regards to Safety Values and the appreciation of incident outcomes.

Many other Downer Unanderra employees were active participants in the development and shooting stages.

Read More

Risk Culture -Reflections of Risk Managers

The Think Tank

As Risk Managers we are tasked with the objective to embed a risk management culture into an organisation, or words to that effect.  This objective seems to be posing more questions than answers currently.  To assist both ourselves, and risk managers in general, we facilitated a think tank involving a cross section of experienced risk managers across several different sectors from health to project risk.

The group grappled with a few key questions:

  1.  What does a risk culture really look like?
  2. What are the things that influence the risk culture?

Two further questions emerged from this:

  1. What should risk champions be?
  2. What do we do if we don’t have senior management buy-in?

We would like to thank those involved in the Think Tank.  This paper aims to summarise the thoughts and inputs from the group and provide some guidance for risk managers in general.

1.     What does a risk culture really look like?

For an organisation to strive towards a risk culture, it needs to have a Vision of the Future to strive towards.   So do we really know what it is we are aiming to embed in organisations?  What does it look like or feel like when there is a Risk Culture?  What do we see?

Interestingly enough, the first question triggered a completely separate question – “what is culture?”.   For the sake of completeness the following definition or description of Culture is provided.

Culture

Culture is a difficult concept to define.  We all intuitively know what we mean, however it is a very complex concept.

Some definitions include:

“A pattern of shared basic assumptions invented, discovered, or developed by a given group as it learns to cope with its problems of external adaptation and internal integration that have worked well enough to be considered valid and therefore, to be taught to new members as the correct way to perceive, think and feel in relation to those problems”   Schein, 1992.

“the specific collection of values and norms that are shared by people and groups in an organization and that control the way they interact with each other and with stakeholders outside the organization.“  Hill and Jones, 2001

The Think Tank group defined Culture as “ the acted out values and behaviours and personality of an organisation, or the way an organisation looks and feels – internally for employees and externally for clients and stakeholders.”

The challenge is how to describe the current culture of an organisation.

The Roshan Institute suggests that Culture refers to the following Ways of Life, including but not limited to:

Language : the oldest human institution and the most sophisticated medium of expression.

Thought : the ways in which people perceive, interpret, and understand the world around them.

Arts & Sciences : Most advanced expression

Spirituality : the value system expressed through language and actions.

Social activity : the shared pursuits within a cultural community

Interaction : the social aspects of human contact, including the give-and-take of socialization, negotiation, protocol, and conventions.

This definition tends to provide a more tangible set of lenses to look at a culture.

Read More